Project & Programme Intelligence
PRINCE2-aligned governance: business cases, stages, risks, issues and dependencies, decisions, actions, lessons and benefits — all linked back to the register.
Lewisham Pilot Territory — intelligence build-out
- Prove the Sankofa operating model in a single borough before extending coverage.
- Do nothing / single-borough pilot / multi-borough launch.
- Verified site register, repeatable verification method, credible pipeline.
- Stage tolerance: +2 weeks, no additional external spend without approval.
- Stage 1 end review — Founder approval required
Sennia mandate onboarding & introduction readiness
- Convert the draft mandate into a confirmed, evidence-backed introduction pipeline.
- Await confirmation / proceed on draft with VERIFY flags / pause.
- First compliant introduction, repeatable scoring model.
- No introduction without PASS and adequate evidence on every mandatory criterion.
- Mandate confirmation meeting
Risk register
| Risk | Cat. | P×I | Response | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mandate is DRAFT. Terms may change on confirmation, invalidating scored opportunities. | Commercial | 16 | Reduce | Mitigating |
| Off-market status could lapse if the vendor instructs an agent. | Commercial | 15 | Reduce | Open |
| Low-confidence public land data may misdirect effort in Lewisham. | Delivery | 9 | Reduce | Mitigating |
| Introducing a non-compliant opportunity without a recorded variation damages institutional credibility. | Reputational | 10 | Avoid | Open |
| Block structure currently rests on a Tier 3 verbal assertion. Introducing on that basis would breach the verification standard. | Compliance | 12 | Reduce | Mitigating |
Issues & dependencies
- DependencyHigh
Maximum acquisition / portfolio value undefined — blocks final scoring weight.
Founder · Open
- DependencyMedium
Home Counties definition undefined — geography scoring held at VERIFY.
Founder · Open
- IssueMedium
Council regeneration contact not yet established in Lewisham.
Intelligence Unit · In progress
Decisions
Confirm the Sennia mandate as written
Mandate is held as DRAFT. Every scored opportunity carries that caveat until confirmed.
Options: Confirm as drafted / Confirm with amendments / Defer pending investor meeting
Recommendation: Confirm as drafted and resolve the four TO CONFIRM fields separately.
Awaiting Founder approvalAlperton Wharf — 38 units against a 40-unit floor
Fails the scale criterion by two units. Otherwise compliant.
Options: Record a written variation / Hold in general database / Discard
Recommendation: Hold in the general database. Do not introduce without a written variation.
Awaiting Founder approvalProceed to introduction on Deptford Creekside Block C
Introduction readiness pending Tier 1 title evidence and funding proof.
Options: Introduce now / Complete verification first / Park
Recommendation: Complete verification first.
Awaiting Founder approvalAdopt the three-tier verification standard as binding
Tier 1 evidence is currently required for block structure and sourcing route. Other criteria accept Tier 2.
Options: Adopt as drafted / Adopt with different tier floors / Defer
Recommendation: Adopt as drafted for the pilot and review at Stage 1 end.
Awaiting Founder approval
Lessons learned
Off-market status decays quickly
Re-verify sourcing route immediately before any introduction; a portal listing invalidates the criterion.
Process · Lewisham pilot
Never infer an unstated mandate limit
Undefined fields are recorded as VERIFY, never assumed. Assumed ceilings distort scoring and mislead investors.
Commercial · Sennia onboarding
A high fit score can still hide a hard fail
Composite scores are advisory only. Readiness is decided criterion by criterion, and a mandatory FAIL always blocks.
Data · Scoring model review
Benefits realisation
Verified site coverage in the pilot territory
Sites at High confidence
baseline 0 → target 25 · realised 1
Introduction-ready compliant opportunities
Opportunities PASS on all mandatory criteria with adequate evidence
baseline 0 → target 3 · realised 0